00909nam a2200133 4500008004100000245003900041210003900080260002300119300000800142520054200150653001000692100002400702856004900726 1993 eng d00aCrustacea Amphipoda di acqua dolce0 aCrustacea Amphipoda di acqua dolce aBolognabCalderini a3373 a

Nine species is reported: (1) Aurobogidiella italica (G. Karaman, 1979); (2) Bogidiella (Bogidiella) albertimagni Hertzog, 1933; (3) Bogidiella (Bogidiella) aprutina Pesce, 1980; (4) Bogidiella (Bogidiella) calicali G. Karaman, 1988; (5) Bogidiella (Bogidiella) ichnusae Ruffo & Vigna Taglianti, 1975; (6) Bogidiella (? Bogidiella) silverii Pesce, 1981; (7) Bogidiella (? Bogidiella) vandeli Coineau, 1968; (8) Bogidiella (Medigidiella) chappuis Ruffo, 1952; (9) Bogidiella (Medigidiella) paraichnusae G. Karaman, 1979.

10aItaly1 aKaraman, Gordan, S. uhttps://bogidiellids.myspecies.info/node/14001388nas a2200145 4500008004100000245019300041210006900234300001000303490000700313520082600320653001101146653001301157100002401170856004801194 1988 eng d00aContribution to the knowledge of Amphipoda 180. Two new species of genus Bogidiella Hert. from Sardinia and France, with remarks to B. vandeli Coineau 1968 (Gammaridea, Fam. Bogidiellidae)0 aContribution to the knowledge of Amphipoda 180 Two new species o a25-410 v343 a

The subterranean freshwater species Bogidiella vandeli Coineau 1968 (Amphipoda Gammaridea, fam. Bogidiellidae), known from Sardinia (Italy) and established and described based on females and males of two different species, is restricted here to the females described by Coineau (1968) from Rio di Quirra (Sardinia).
The new species Bogidiella (Bogidiella) calicali, n. sp. is described and figured from Castelsardo and from Rio di Quirra (Sardinia); this species was known in the past under the name of males of Bogidiella vandeli Coineau 1968 from Rio di Quirra.
The new species Bogidiella (Bogidiella) nicolae, n. sp. is established for the specimens from the subterranean waters of Tech (southern France), described by Coineau (1968) under the name of Bogidiella skopljensis (S. Karaman 1933).

10aFrance10aSardinia1 aKaraman, Gordan, S. uhttps://bogidiellids.myspecies.info/node/5905617nas a2200145 4500008004100000245008200041210007100123300001200194490000700206520509400213653001005307653001305317100002005330856012105350 1968 eng d00aContribution à l’étude de la faune interstitielle: isopodes et amphipodes0 aContribution à l étude de la faune interstitielle isopodes et am a145-2160 v553 a

B. vandeli s’individualise très bien au sein des autres Bogidiella connus: les caractères sexuels secondaires qui portent sur les antennes I et II, les mandibules, les maxilles I et II, les gnathopodes I et II, les péreiopodes (organes elliptiques présents uniquement chez les femelles sur P3, P4, P5 et P6), les pléopodes, les uropodes et le telson en font une espèce remarquable.
Un tel dimorphisme accentué, avec des différences aussi nombreuses, aurait pu entraîner un doute quant à l’identité spécifique des deux catégories d’animaux. Mais la présence de plusieurs femelles à oostégites, ainsi que la vésicule séminale des mâles nettement visible par transparence, permettent d’acquérir la certitude qu’il s’agit bien des mâles et des femelles de la même espèce.
B. tabascensis Villalobos, qui vit dans une grotte du Mexique, présente également des caractères sexuels secondaires (proportions des articles du pédoncule des antennes I, nombre de soies du basis des gnathopodes I, chétotaxie des péréiopodes, telson plus long chez le male et possédant davantage d’épines) mais beaucoup moins marqués que chez B. vandeli sp. n. Parmi les autres espèces, on ne trouve généralement aucune remarque relative au dimorphisme: seuls, Mateus note que les màles et les femelles de B. helenae sont absolument identiques, et Hertzog indique que les males de B. skopljensis sont plus grands que les femelles et possèdent des gnathopodes à propode plus élargi et les uropodes III qui sont peut-être moins armés que chez les femelles.

La question du dimorphisme mise à part, les espèces les plus proches de B. vandeli sont B. chappuisi et B. hebraea.
La liste des espèces du genre Bogidiella montre sa très vaste répartition:
B. albertimagni Hertzog 1933, Strasbourg, France, eaux phréatiques; Cerna Cat, Roumanie; Sitges, Espagne.
B. skopljensis Karaman 1933, eaux interstitielles phréatiques, Skoplje et ses environs, Yougoslavie; Transylvanie, Roumanie; vallée du Tech, France.
B. chappuisi Ruffo 1952, eaux interstitielles littorales, Roussillon, Corse, France; Algérie; Maroc; Yougoslavie.
B. neotropica Ruffo 1952, source en relation avec le fleuve Cupari, Brésil.
B. brasiliensis Siewing 1953, eaux interstitielles littorales, San Salvador et Ilha, Brésil.
B. lindbergi Ruffo 1958, eaux cavernicoles, grotte Nayak, près Pol-Ranga, Afghanistan.
B. longiflagellum Karaman 1959, puits vallée du Vardar, Yougoslavie.
B. bredini Shoemaker 1959, eaux cavernicoles, Ile de Barduda, Antilles.
B. tabascensis Villalobos 1960, eaux cavernicoles, grotte Cocona, Teapa (Tabasco), Mexique.
B. semidenticulata Mestrov 1961, eaux interstitielles, rivières Slovénie et Croatie, Yougoslavie.
B. denticulata Mestrov 1961, eaux interstitielles, rivières Slovénie et Croatie, Yougoslavie.
B. hebraea Ruffo 1963, eaux souterraines, dépression de la mer Morte, Israël.
B. helenae Mateus 1967, eaux interstitielles littorales, Cabedelo (non loin de l'embouchure du Douro), Portugal.
B. ruffoi Birstein et Ljovuschkin 1968, source thermale Khodja-Kaynar, Turkménie.
B. vandeli sp. n., eaux phréatiques du Rio di Quirra, Sardaigne.

Malgré sa grande extension, le genre Bogidiella reste très homogène. Ruffo (1963) indique les principaux critères variant d’une espèce à l’autre: nombre d’épines au telson, conformation des pléopodes uni ou biramés, puis, nombre d’articles au flagelle accessoire des antennes I, nombre d'épines au lobe interne des maxilles I, forme des propodes des gnathopodes I et II et leur garniture d’épines palmaires, nombre de longues soies au bord postérieur du basis des gnathopodes, presence ou absence d'organes elliptiques, chetotaxie du propode de P7, chetotaxie des uropodes. En s’appuyant sur ces caracteres, Ruffo pense pouvoir distinguer deux groupes d’especes: d’une part, celui des formes europeennes et mediterraneennes (B. albertimagni, B. skopljensis, B. longiflagellum, B. semidenticulata, B. denticulata, B. hebraea); on pourrait ajouter a ce groupe B. vandeli. Les especes sud et nord-americaines forment un second groupe bien differencie du premier morphologiquement (В. brasiliensis, B. neotropica, B. bredini, B. tabascensis) [Ruffo, 1963, p. 193]. Il conviendrait plutot de dire “les especes sud et centre-americaines” a la place de “sud et nord-americaines”.

10aItaly10aSardinia1 aCoineau, Nicole uhttp://bibliotheques.mnhn.fr/EXPLOITATION/infodoc/digitalCollections/viewerpopup.aspx?seid=MEAZO_S00A_1968_T055_N00303432nas a2200133 4500008004100000245012900041210006900170300001000239490000700249520296400256653001303220100001803233856004703251 1973 eng d00aStudi sui Crostacei Anfipodi 74. Contributo alla revisione del genere Bogidiella Hertzog (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Gammaridae)0 aStudi sui Crostacei Anfipodi 74 Contributo alla revisione del ge a49-770 v313 a

At least 18 species of Europe, Africa, Asia, Middle and South America, belong to the genus Bogidiella Hertzog 1933 (= Jugocrangonyx S. Karaman 1933). This paper gives a catalog of all the species well known today, with their bibliographical data and their occurrence. The Authors then examine the systematic position of the genus Bogidiella which has been classified in a special family (Bogidiellidae) by some authors, and which is considered to belong to the Gammaridae by others. The analysis of the features of this genus made us decide to include it in the Gammaridae family, of which it forms a particular group, in any case (Bogidiella group). Pseudingolfiella Noodt and, probably, Parancrangonyx Stebbing and Kerguelenella Ruffo also belong to this group which is characterized by the pleopods reduction. We have studied the specific characters of all the species of Bogidiella, and their relationship with the taxonomy of the genus; those characters have been included in the tables (see table I) and discussed individually. We have concluded that the majority of the described species are valid; doubts are expressed on the B. glacialis S. Karaman, which is probably synonimous of B. albertimagni Hertzog and on B. ruffoi Birstein and Ljovuschkin, which is very similar to the B. lindbergi Ruffo. Considering current knowledge on the subject, it is not possible to recognize groups of similar species within the genus; as a matter of fact, the species known today show a range of diverging characters which are combined differently in different geographical areas. A table is shown to classify, using the more evident morphological characters, the different species of Bogidiella. From an ecological point of view the Bogidiella is divided into four different groups: a) mesopsammic marine species, b) litoral interstitial species, c) hyporheic interstitial species, d) troglobitic species. Two morphologically distinct types correspond to those four ecological groups: the mesopsammic interstitial type, which characterizes the first, second and third group, and the troglobitic type. From a biogeographical and evolutionary point of view, it seems evident that the Bogidiella come from the sea and their spreading to fresh water occurred in two different ways: the first was through the litoral interstitial habitat to the hyporrheic interstitial habitat, and the second by colonization, directly or indirectly, of large underground water basins. This population of the fresh water certainly occurred during different periods; as a matter of fact it is possible to find, even today, litoral interstitial species moving to the fresh water, while on the other hand species localized in regions corresponding to tertiary seas far from the actual coastal lines have been described (Central Asia, the Dead Sea, Danubian Region). With regard to this latter case, the transition to fresh water certainly occurred during the prequaternary period.

10arevision1 aRuffo, Sandro uhttps://bogidiellids.myspecies.info/node/2