00778nas a2200169 4500008004100000245011200041210007000153300001200223490000600235520024500241653000900486653001400495653001400509100001800523700001900541856004800560 1988 eng d00aDécouverte du premier bogidiellide (amphipodes cavernicoles) a l’est de la ligne de Wallace en Indonesie0 aDécouverte du premier bogidiellide amphipodes cavernicoles a l e a371-3770 v43 a

Females of a Bogidiella s.l., found in a cave of the island of Halmahera, are described as a new species, B. deharvengi. This is the first representative of the family Bogidiellidae discovered east of the Wallace line in Indonesia.

10aAsia10aHalmahera10aIndonesia1 aStock, Jan, H1 aBotosaneanu, L uhttps://bogidiellids.myspecies.info/node/9700853nas a2200145 4500008004100000245010400041210006900145300001200214490000700226520037100233653001900604653001800623100001800641856004800659 1988 eng d00aStygofauna of the Canary Islands 8. Amphipoda (Crustacea) from inland groundwaters of Fuerteventura0 aStygofauna of the Canary Islands 8 Amphipoda Crustacea from inla a105-1120 v113 a

New material of Bogidiella from Fuerteventura (Canary Islands) provided evidence that the specimens of the genus previously recorded from inland groundwaters belong to a species new to science: B. (Stygogidiella) purpuriae, closely related to the thalassostygobiont, B. (S) uniramosa from Lanzarote. New records of Pygocrangonyx repens are provided as well.

10aCanary Islands10aFuerteventura1 aStock, Jan, H uhttps://bogidiellids.myspecies.info/node/9100861nas a2200145 4500008004100000245013900041210006900180300001000249490000700259520035200266653001100618653001400629100002400643856004800667 1988 eng d00aContribution to the knowledge of the Amphipoda 179. New genera and species of the subterranean family Bogidiellidae from the Near East0 aContribution to the knowledge of the Amphipoda 179 New genera an a31-510 v193 a

The new genus and species, Hebraegidiella bromleyana, n. gen. n. sp. and a new species Bogidiella (?Bogidiella) copia, n. sp. (Amphipoda Gammaridea, fam. Bogidiellidae), are described and figured from the subterranean salt (brackish) waters of Enot Qane (En Gedi region, W. coast of Dead Sea), and their taxonomic relations are discussed.

10aIsrael10aNear East1 aKaraman, Gordan, S. uhttps://bogidiellids.myspecies.info/node/6001388nas a2200145 4500008004100000245019300041210006900234300001000303490000700313520082600320653001101146653001301157100002401170856004801194 1988 eng d00aContribution to the knowledge of Amphipoda 180. Two new species of genus Bogidiella Hert. from Sardinia and France, with remarks to B. vandeli Coineau 1968 (Gammaridea, Fam. Bogidiellidae)0 aContribution to the knowledge of Amphipoda 180 Two new species o a25-410 v343 a

The subterranean freshwater species Bogidiella vandeli Coineau 1968 (Amphipoda Gammaridea, fam. Bogidiellidae), known from Sardinia (Italy) and established and described based on females and males of two different species, is restricted here to the females described by Coineau (1968) from Rio di Quirra (Sardinia).
The new species Bogidiella (Bogidiella) calicali, n. sp. is described and figured from Castelsardo and from Rio di Quirra (Sardinia); this species was known in the past under the name of males of Bogidiella vandeli Coineau 1968 from Rio di Quirra.
The new species Bogidiella (Bogidiella) nicolae, n. sp. is established for the specimens from the subterranean waters of Tech (southern France), described by Coineau (1968) under the name of Bogidiella skopljensis (S. Karaman 1933).

10aFrance10aSardinia1 aKaraman, Gordan, S. uhttps://bogidiellids.myspecies.info/node/5900627nas a2200145 4500008004100000245006300041210005800104300001000162490000700172520020300179653001300382100001900395700001900414856004800433 1988 eng d00aA stygobiont amphipod from Thailand (Crustacea: Amphipoda)0 astygobiont amphipod from Thailand Crustacea Amphipoda a51-590 v243 a

Bogidiella (Bogidiella) thai sp, n. is described from a cave in South Thailand. This is the first stygobiont amphipod discovered in the continental fresh-water of the Indochinese Peninsula.

10aThailand1 aBotosaneanu, L1 aNotenboom, Jos uhttps://bogidiellids.myspecies.info/node/5700736nas a2200157 4500008004100000245013800041210006900179300001000248490000800258520019500266653002200461653001000483100001800493700001900511856004800530 1988 eng d00aGroundwater crustaceans of Spain 3. Five new bogidiellid Amphipoda from Spain - the first freshwater records in the Iberian Peninsula0 aGroundwater crustaceans of Spain 3 Five new bogidiellid Amphipod a75-950 v1643 a

Five new species of the amphipod genus Bogidiella are described  from fresh groundwaters in Spain. No freshwater Bogidiellidae were known previously from the Iberian peninsula.

10aIberian Peninsula10aSpain1 aStock, Jan, H1 aNotenboom, Jos uhttps://bogidiellids.myspecies.info/node/2904560nas a2200157 4500008004100000245015500041210006900196300001000265490000600275520400000281653001404281653001404295100002104309700002404330856004804354 1988 eng d00aUn caso de simpatria de tres especies del genero Bogidiella (Crustacea, Amphipoda) en el Noroeste Argentino, con la descripcion de dos nuevas especies0 aUn caso de simpatria de tres especies del genero Bogidiella Crus a64-780 v43 a

Three species of Bogidiella were collected together in the hyporheal of the river Medina, Sierra de Medina (27°01'S 65°04'W) Tucuman, Argentina.
One of the species B. tucumanensis Grosso & Fernandez, 1985 was already known from the Tafí stream, sierras de San Javier, 30 Km to the southwest; the two others are new B. horcomollensis n. sp. has also been collected in Las Cañas river, Sierras de San Javier, 8 km south of the Tafí stream, and B. ringueleti n. sp. has been found in the type locality only. Both new species are described (both sexes).
B. horcomollensis is the most plesiomorphic of these species. It is characterized by the outer lobe of the second maxilla bearing less than 10 spines; the second male pleopod in which the outer plumose seta of the second article is modified into a foliaceous structure with short spinules on the edge; the outer lobe of maxilliped bearing 2 spines; the inner lobe of the second maxilla having the inner spine more developed than the other ones. There are no modifications in the second male uropod in the first male of female uropods, or in the first male pleopod.
B. ringueleti possesses more than 10 spines on the outer lobe of the second maxilla; the second male pleopod is modified as in B. horcomollensis, however it lacks spinules on the edge, but shows a spinulose area in the enlarged basal part; the second male uropod has a shortened and enlarged peduncle and endopod, with a strongly developed hollow spine and another small one which closes the cavity; the telson is longer than wide; the outer lobe of the maxilliped carries 4 spines; the inner lobe of the second maxilla has the inner spines more developed than die others; the first male and female uropods, as well as the first male pleopod do not show modifications.
B. tucumanensis shares similar modifications with the former species in the second male pleopod; like B. ringueleti it has modifications in the second male uropod and it possesses two autapomorphies: slight modifications in the first uropod of both sexes and in the first male pleopod, the exopod of which is shortened and enlarged, the external element of the second article being bent in a right angle.
Through phylogenetic analysis we found that the three species form a monophyletic group sharing the same modification in the second male pleopod. В. ringueleti and B. tucumanensis possess three synapomorphies: the second male uropod with the same modification, the edge of the foliaceous seta of the second male pleopod without spinules and the number of spines of the outer lobe of the second maxilla being 10 or more.
Because of the different combinations of modified appendages and according to recent systematic criteria, the three species belong to three different subgenera: В. horcomollensis belongs to Stygogidiella Stock. В. ringueleti to Dyctiogidiella Grosso & Claps, and В. tucumanensis to Mesochtongidiella Grosso & Fernandez.
A lack of articulation in the palp of the first maxilla of some individuals of B. horcomollensis and B. ringueleti was observed; this variable character was used in the past to establish genera in this family.
The high rate of supernumerary spines in the telson, and the intermediate shapes between the modified male pleopod in mixed populations of В. tucumanensis and the unmodified one is considered a sign of hybridization. Such variations were not observed in isolated populations of B. horcomollensis and B. tucumanensis. B. ringueleti was never found in allopatric situations, and has been described on the basis of individuals without traces of hybrization.
Although the close phylogenetic relationships and lack of exclusion is suggestive of sympatric speciation, the meeting of the three species after differentiation by allopatric speciation before the formation of the Sierra de Medina is considered to be more probable.

10aArgentina10aphylogeny1 aGrosso, Luise, E1 aFernández, Hugo, R uhttps://bogidiellids.myspecies.info/node/21